The nubuck feels nice! The color is super subtle and premium. On foot, it’s the same familiar fit: snug, secure, a bit rigid. The "mid" cut is perfect for showing off your socks, too. For $125? I think this specific colorway is a winner. If you like muted tones, this is a great pick. Just know the comfort tech inside is, well, vintage. My first thought unboxing? The air jordan 1 mid looks clean and well-made – no complaints on craftsmanship! Wearing them, the weight is manageable, and the fit is snug around the midfoot. Compared to other Jordan 1s, this Mid version is more affordable at $125. Pros: easy to match and durable. Cons: the ankle padding could be softer. It's a go-to for casual sneakerheads, but if you're into high-performance basketball shoes, this isn't it. A solid, everyday option from the Jordan lineup. Got this Air Jordan 1 Mid "Shattered Backboard" inspired colorway in hand. The colors are vibrant! On foot, they're true to the original 1's DNA: a bit heavy, very structured. The ankle support from the mid-cut is noticeable. Is it worth the ~$130? If you love the design language of the Jordan series, absolutely. It's a piece of history. But if you need all-day, walk-all-over-cushion... you might be disappointed. It's a legend in lifestyle wear, not in comfort tech. What's up, everyone? Just unboxed these "air jordan 1 mid" in the 'Light Smoke Grey' colorway. The materials feel decent for the price point... the leather has a nice grain. Slip them on, and yeah - that iconic silhouette is instantly recognizable. They're not heavy, but you feel grounded. Compared to an AJ1 High, the ankle collar is obviously lower, which I prefer for everyday comfort. Pro? Unbeatable versatility. Con? The insole is basic. Worth it if you want a classic look without the High-top price tag.

  • Shown: Bloodline
  • Style: DZ5485-612

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5