The red really pops! Compared to the OG High version, the "Mid" lacks some of that top-tier ankle support, but honestly? For casual wear, it’s totally fine. A huge pro is the easier on-and-off. A con? That break-in period can be a bit stiff. Alright, so, first look out of the box — this ‘Light Smoke Grey’ "Air Jordan 1 Mid" feels premium. The leather is decently soft, not cardboard-stiff, which is a nice surprise for the $125 price point. I’m digging the clean, wearable color-blocking straight away. It’s a classic "Jordan" silhouette that just works. First look at this 'Light Smoke Grey' "Air Jordan 1 Mid" – the color blocking is absolutely fire in person, way better than on-screen. The build quality is on point; no glue stains or messy stitching on my pair. Once laced up, they offer that familiar, secure feel – nothing revolutionary, but reliably comfortable for walking. Comparing it to other Jordan models, the Mid sits nicely between the bulky AF1 and the more streamlined Dunk. The advantage? Incredible colorway that's easier to cop than many High OG releases. The drawback? That stiff ankle collar might need a short break-in period. My verdict? A must for colorway collectors and fans of grey-toned sneakers. Probably not the best choice if you have very wide feet, as the toe box is standard. Alright, let's get into this pair of "air jordan 1 mid" 'Shadow' edition. First off, the build quality is solid - no glue stains, clean stitching. The color blocking is just timeless, honestly. On foot, it’s that classic AJ1 feel: secure lockdown, but you know the cushioning is firm. It's a style-first shoe, for sure. At around $125 USD, it's a more accessible entry into the "Jordan series" compared to some Highs. Great for collectors or casual wear, but if you need plush comfort, look elsewhere.

  • Shown: Black Toe
  • Style: 555088-036

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5