Air jordan 1 mid : Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid SE" was a pleasant surprise [ginvuu05]
The "Dark Chocolate" colorway looks even better in person. On foot, the comfort is... typical for an AJ1: firm. The padded collar helps, but don't expect Boost-level softness. The "advantage" of the Mid is its flexibility for pants or shorts. A potential downside? For people with wider feet, the break-in might be tough. Overall, if you prioritize style over supreme comfort, this is a win. Let's talk pros & cons. Pros: Iconic style, relatively accessible price ($120 USD), easy to wear. The 'Metallic Silver' is a sharp, neutral-ish option. Cons? The comfort isn't for everyone - it's a firm, flat ride. If you need plush cushioning, look elsewhere. This shoe is about style & heritage, not performance tech. Here's my real take: the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is a style champion. This 'Black Toe' colorblocking just works with almost anything – jeans, joggers, shorts. On camera, the proportions look great. Compared to the OG High, the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" has a slightly shorter collar, which some people prefer for mobility. Major pro? That timeless design. Con? The flat, insole isn't the best for all-day walking, in my honest opinion. Here's my take after a full day in these "Air Jordan 1 Mids". The "GS" version for my niece was a solid gift idea. The main "benefit" is the timeless design. On the flip side, the arch support is minimal—not ideal if you're on your feet all day. Compared to a Jordan 1 Low, the Mid offers a bit more structure. For $115-$135 USD, you're paying for the legacy and look. It's perfect for teens and sneakerheads who value style history.
- Shown: Blank Canvas
- Style: 555088-036
Available
Market Leader | Sales exceeded 10K+
-
Guaranteed PurchaseIt will open in a new window, receive the product you are expecting or we will refund your money.
Product reviews
4.9
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
1
Characteristics assessment
| Cost-benefit |
Rating 4.5 out of 10 5 |
| Comfortable |
Rating 4.3 out of 5 |
| It's light |
Rating 4.3 out of 5 |
| Quality of materials |
Rating 4.1 of 5 |
| popular |
Assessment 4 of 5 |
