The leather quality is solid for the $120 price point—not buttery, but it has a nice grain. I love how the mid-cut silhouette maintains that classic Jordan 1 look. Honestly, it's a super versatile pair for the collection. On feet, the Air Jordan 1 Mid feels... well, like a classic Jordan 1. Don't expect modern, plush cushioning here – it's firm. The ankle collar on the Mid is a bit lower than the High, which I actually prefer for easier wear. The break-in period is real, though. After a few hours, they'll start to mold to your foot. For true comfort seekers? Look elsewhere. For style? It's a winner. Alright, so I just unboxed this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" in the 'Black Gym Red' colorway, and honestly, the first impression is solid. The leather quality? It's decent for the $115 price point – you get that classic, clean silhouette instantly. Putting them on, the fit is true to size with a snug, secure wrap around the ankle. Compared to the OG Highs, you're losing a little height, but for daily wear? It's a more casual, accessible look. The major pro is the timeless style; it goes with literally everything. The con? The cushioning is firm – don't expect Boost-like comfort. My take? If you want a versatile, iconic sneaker without the high-top commitment or the high price, this Mid is perfect. If you need plush comfort for all-day wear, maybe look elsewhere. So I'm lacing up these "Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Banned'" inspired joints. On feet? Immediate classic vibes. The fit is true to size for me, offering a good, secure lockdown. Honestly, for daily wear, the Mid's slightly lower cut can feel a bit more "versatile" than the Highs. The big pro here is the iconic look without the crazy resell price. Cons? The insole is basic—cushioning is firm, not plush. Great for style, not for all-day comfort.

  • Shown: Gold Hoops
  • Style: CT8527-400

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5