Opening the box gives you that iconic vibe immediately – the red, black, and white just works. The build feels sturdy; no complaints for the price point. Slipping them on, the ankle collar is stiff initially, but it'll mold to your ankle. Compared to a true OG High 'Chicago,' you're missing some height and history, but the core style is 95% there for less money. The big pro is capturing that legendary look affordably. The trade-off? You might get "it's not the High" comments from sneakerheads. In my view, this is perfect for fans of the Chicago color blocking who want a more accessible and often more available option. Hardcore OG collectors will likely still hold out for the High. Okay, let's get into these "Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Triple Black'"! First thing I noticed unboxing was that classic, "clean" silhouette. The all-leather upper feels solid – not the absolute "best" quality, but for $115 USD, it's totally fine! The black-on-black look is super versatile right out of the box. Yo, opening the box right now... and wow, this "Black Toe" "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is fire. The color-blocking is "perfect". On foot, they're true to size with a solid, locked-down feel. It's a sturdy shoe, no doubt — you feel connected to the ground. Is it the most comfortable Jordan? Nope, not even close to a Jordan 13, for example. But for a style icon that goes with literally anything? It's a classic for a reason. If you're new to the Jordan series, this is a fantastic, relatively affordable entry point. Big pro of the Air Jordan 1 Mid? Versatility. This 'Black Toe' colorway goes with literally everything—jeans, shorts, joggers. The leather wipes clean easily. The cons? That classic Jordan 1 sole is flat and firm. If you need arch support or plush comfort for all-day wear, you might wanna look elsewhere.

  • Shown: Blank Canvas
  • Style: 555088-711

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5