Terms of the offer
The shape is on point. Sliding my foot in, the padding around the collar is minimal, which is my main gripe. They're lightweight and easy to style with almost anything. Versus a Dunk Low? The AJ1 Mid has more structure. Pro: Low-key, everyday sneaker. Con: Lack of premium materials. At this price in the "Jordan series", it's about the silhouette. Good for minimalists, not for comfort seekers. The durability on these seems great. The materials, while not luxury, can take a beating. I’ve worn my older "Air Jordan 1 Mid" pairs for years! They crease, sure—it’s part of the look. A potential downside? The ankle collar can dig in a bit if you have sensitive skin… wearing higher socks solves that. Overall, they're low-maintenance sneakers. Ideal for students or anyone who wants a tough, stylish shoe that lasts. Who might not love it? If you prioritize super-soft cushioning above all else, look elsewhere. This isn't a "comfort-first" sneaker. Also, if you're a purest for the original 1985 High OG design, the slightly altered proportions of the Mid might bug you. But for most people wanting that AJ1 style? The Air Jordan 1 Mid is a fantastic, more affordable door into the Jordan series. Putting these air jordan 1 mid shoes on for the first time — wow, the fit is snug, but not too tight! I went true to size, and the cushioning? It's firm, typical for a Jordan 1, so don't expect cloud-like comfort. Compared to other Jordans, like the AJ1 High, the mid-cut offers slightly less ankle support. Pros: classic style and easy to style. Cons: might be stiff for all-day wear. Great for casual outings!
- Shown: Game Royal
- Style: DJ5718-242
