Air jordan 1 mid : Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle [lhcd8mb3]

It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget. Alright, let's get into these "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Triple White's. First off, the all-leather build here – for around $115 USD – is super clean. The white-on-white colorway is "incredibly" versatile. However, the out-of-box feel is pretty stiff, classic "Jordan 1" style. If you're used to modern, plush sneakers, you might find these a bit unforgiving at first. Honestly, I'd recommend these more for style-first collectors than for performance. For the collectors on a budget, listen up. This "air jordan 1 mid" offers that iconic look without draining your wallet. The version I have is the 'Chicago Black Toe' inspired one. Construction is standard - nothing luxury, but it gets the job done. On feet, they feel... familiar. It's the same tooling as always. Compared to retro releases, you're sacrificing some material quality for accessibility. Pro: Iconic design. Con: You feel the cost-cutting. It's a gateway into the "Jordan series", ideal for new fans. Just got this "Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Ice Blue'" in. The color pops! In terms of craftsmanship, everything looks clean—no glue stains I can see. Wearing them, the ankle support is less than a High, which could be a "pro or con" depending on your preference. They feel lighter, which I like. Honestly, if you're looking for a statement sneaker in the Jordan series that won't break the bank, this Mid delivers. Not for performance basketball, obviously.

• Shown: University Blue
• Style: CT8527-100