That lower cut makes it easier to style with different pants compared to the Highs. The outsole grip is good for everyday use. However, the insole is pretty basic – I'd recommend swapping it for something more supportive if you're planning on being on your feet all day. It's a trade-off for that classic, clean aesthetic. On feet now, and the initial feel is... exactly what you expect from an AJ1. It's firm, not plush. The ankle collar on this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is lower than the Highs, so you get a bit more mobility, which I actually prefer for all-day wear. The lockdown? Solid. No heel slippage for me. It’s a straightforward, reliable fit. So, here's my take on the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" as a whole. Every time I unbox one, I'm reminded why it's a staple: that timeless silhouette, available in endless color stories. For around $115, you're getting a piece of sneaker history. On feet, they're flat and firm – that's just the Jordan 1 DNA. Don't buy it for cloud-like comfort; buy it for the style and heritage. Compared to the High, you save a bit of money and get a slightly more modern, wearable profile. Pro: Unbeatable versatility and iconic status. Con: The lack of modern cushioning tech. Honestly, it's perfect for beginners entering the sneaker world or veterans wanting a durable, classic beater. Not ideal for folks who prioritize advanced foot comfort above all else. Initial thoughts on foot with the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Paris Saint-Germain' collab? The materials feel premium. The fit is secure, but break-in is required – no doubt. Visually, the mix of grey, pink, and black is unique. It stands out from the typical "Jordan series" releases. Worth the price? For PSG fans or AJ1 completists, yes. For someone wanting a comfy, go-anywhere shoe, probably not. It's a specific vibe.

  • Shown: Desert Moss
  • Style: 555088-701

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5