Air jordan 1 mid : Now, the cons (gotta be honest) [qrcxogcn]

The cushioning is firm — not for long periods of standing/walking if you need support. Some purists still overlook the Mid vs. the High (but that’s their loss!). Break-in time is real; the ankle might feel stiff at first. If you prioritize ultimate comfort over style, this might not be your #1. It’s a classic, but not a comfort-tech masterpiece. Unboxing this 'Triple White' "Air Jordan 1 Mid" – wow, these are crisp. The leather has a nice grain. Sliding them on, the ankle collar is padded just enough. They feel more flexible than older Mids I've owned. The all-white look is a summer killer, but be warned: they'll get dirty fast. A great, affordable alternative to the High OG versions, for sure. Unboxing this new Air Jordan 1 Mid colorway... wow, the color-blocking is actually "fire". The leather has a nice sheen to it! On foot, the break-in period is real – you'll feel that around the pinky toe, no cap. It's a bit heavier than I remembered, but the silhouette is just iconic. The pros? Style, history, and endless outfit options. The cons? Arch support isn't the best, and the cushion is basic. For a sneakerhead wanting a classic Jordan vibe without the crazy resale? Perfect. For performance? Not even close. Just got this "Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Ice Blue'" in. The color pops! In terms of craftsmanship, everything looks clean—no glue stains I can see. Wearing them, the ankle support is less than a High, which could be a "pro or con" depending on your preference. They feel lighter, which I like. Honestly, if you're looking for a statement sneaker in the Jordan series that won't break the bank, this Mid delivers. Not for performance basketball, obviously.

• Shown: Georgetown
• Style: DH6927-111