On foot, though, the cushioning is minimal — you'll feel the ground, which some might dislike. Versus other Jordans, it's lighter than the Highs. I'd recommend it for collectors or casual wear, but if you need max comfort, look elsewhere. A classic, nonetheless! For the collectors on a budget, listen up. This "air jordan 1 mid" offers that iconic look without draining your wallet. The version I have is the 'Chicago Black Toe' inspired one. Construction is standard - nothing luxury, but it gets the job done. On feet, they feel... familiar. It's the same tooling as always. Compared to retro releases, you're sacrificing some material quality for accessibility. Pro: Iconic design. Con: You feel the cost-cutting. It's a gateway into the "Jordan series", ideal for new fans. Now, the not-so-great part. If you're after amazing comfort or modern tech, look elsewhere. The cushioning is basic—it's not a shoe for all-day walking or basketball. Also, the leather quality can vary by colorway; sometimes it's a bit stiff. It's a style-first, comfort-second kind of model. Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Barely Orange' – wow, the color is vibrant! It's a summer-ready vibe straight out of the box. Construction feels standard for the line – durable and well-put-together. On-foot, they're lightweight and easy to move in, which I appreciate. The mid-cut provides good ankle support for casual use without feeling restrictive. The major pro here is the bold, standout color – perfect for adding a pop to neutral fits. The con? Such a bright color can be harder to style daily, and it might show dirt easily. I'd recommend this to anyone wanting to add a fun, seasonal color to their rotation. If you prefer only neutral, go-to-everything sneakers, this loud "Air Jordan 1 Mid" might not be your daily driver.

  • Shown: Desert Moss
  • Style: 555088-161

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5