Opening the box, the texture mix really makes it pop, giving a premium feel over the standard all-leather versions. Sliding my foot in, the fit is consistent: snug in the heel, roomy in the toe box. Wearing them, the SE details get you compliments – it stands out from the basic Mids. A huge pro is the unique look without a crazy price hike (around $125). A potential con? Suede can be harder to maintain than plain leather. In my opinion, if you already have a core "Jordan 1 Mid" colorway and want something with more character, this SE is a great pick. If you're rough on your shoes or live in a rainy area, maybe reconsider. My honest review after wearing these all day: The "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is a legend for a reason. The silhouette is just perfect. For casual wear, running errands, even a light shootaround, they hold up. The $125 USD price tag feels fair for what you get – a piece of sneaker history. However, if you have a wider foot, you might find the fit a bit narrow. Consider trying a half-size up. Is it worth the money? At "$125 USD", I’d say… yes, for the right person. You're paying for the iconic design and brand legacy of the "Jordan series". You're "not" paying for advanced cushioning. For a style-focused shoe that’s built well, it’s fair. I’d avoid paying huge resale, though. Grab a colorway you love at retail. Not for performance basketball, obviously, but for a lifestyle staple? Solid choice. Unboxing this new Air Jordan 1 Mid, and I'm immediately struck by the color — it's a clean, versatile white and grey pair. The construction seems on point; no glue stains or messy stitching on my pair. On feet, the cushioning is what you expect: firm. It's not a Boost or React kind of ride, but for all-day wear, it's perfectly fine. A timeless piece for any rotation, in my opinion.

  • Shown: Bred
  • Style: 555088-603

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5