Initial thoughts? The materials feel a step up – nice tumbled leather! The grey & white is super wearable. Putting them on... the ankle collar is stiff "initially", but the midfoot lockdown is good. Compared to my Dunks, the AJ1 Mid feels more structured. I love the classic basketball profile on foot. Downside? The outsole is a bit slippery on smooth surfaces. At around $120, it's a great entry into the Jordan series. But if you have wide feet? "Proceed with caution." First impression out of the box? The air jordan 1 mid ("Black/Gold" edition, $115 USD) has a sleek profile! Part of the Jordan series, it looks premium — but up close, some materials are a bit stiff. On foot, it's comfortable for short trips, yet the arch support is basic. Compared to newer models, it lacks tech. Pros: affordable and versatile. Cons: not for wide feet. Great for everyday use, skip if you need cushioning! Opening the box, the air jordan 1 mid's profile is just iconic – that never gets old! For this Black/White pair at $125, the value is there if you want a classic. When I walk in them, the support is good, but the break-in period is real. Cameras love this shoe; it always looks sharp. Main advantage? Timeless aesthetics. Downside? The midsole is pretty stiff. Great for style-focused folks, but probably not the best pick for people with wide feet or those needing plush cushioning. First look at this 'White Gym Red' Air Jordan 1 Mid. Super crisp and easy to match. Trying them on, the toe box has a bit more room than I expected - maybe go half size down if you like a snug fit. The mid-top height is actually perfect for showing off your socks. Pro? A fantastic canvas for customizing. Potential downside? The all-white leather can scuff easily. For a clean, affordable Jordan 1, it's a great pick-up, honestly.

  • Shown: Bloodline
  • Style: 555088-311

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5