Air jordan 1 mid : Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" "Altitude Green" and my first thought is- "This leather will crease, and that's okay [ud0bklah]

" It's part of the story! Wearing them feels nostalgic — takes me back. The traction is good on dry surfaces, and the padded tongue is a nice touch. Is it worth the $125? As a piece of sneaker culture, absolutely. As a pinnacle of foot technology? No way. I'd steer a basketball player toward modern Jordans, but I'd tell a fashion-head this is a must-consider. Alright, let's get these out of the box. First impression? The classic "Air Jordan 1 Mid" silhouette is just… timeless. This 'University Red' colorway pops! The build quality feels solid, no loose stitching I can see. At around "$125 USD", it's a more accessible entry into the "Jordan series" compared to some Highs. The leather is decent, not super premium, but that's expected. For a clean, classic look? It's hard to beat. Here's my real take: the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" gets some hate, but it's unjustified. This 'Barely Orange' pair has amazing materials! On feet, they're comfortable for casual wear. The mid-top height is the sweet spot for me – it's supportive without feeling restrictive. Cons? The outsole is thin; traction is just okay. But for $120? You're paying for the iconic look and it delivers. So I'm lacing up this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Chicago'... man, that color blocking is "iconic". The build is pretty standard for Mids – decent but not amazing. On foot, it's true to size with a secure fit. The insole is thin, so I might swap it. Visually, it's a 10/10 – such a statement piece. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 Mid has more of that "heritage" feel. Great for collectors or just rocking a classic. Not so great if you're on your feet all day. Honestly? For $125, you're paying for the look, not groundbreaking tech.

• Shown: Rookie Of The Year
• Style: DZ5485-410