Air jordan 1 mid : Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle [v2wnpnqa]

It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget. Unboxing this new Air Jordan 1 Mid colorway... wow, the color-blocking is actually "fire". The leather has a nice sheen to it! On foot, the break-in period is real – you'll feel that around the pinky toe, no cap. It's a bit heavier than I remembered, but the silhouette is just iconic. The pros? Style, history, and endless outfit options. The cons? Arch support isn't the best, and the cushion is basic. For a sneakerhead wanting a classic Jordan vibe without the crazy resale? Perfect. For performance? Not even close. Okay, putting these "Air Jordan 1 Mids" to the test. This "Chicago Black Toe" look is fire, and at around $125 USD, it's way more accessible than an OG High. The leather quality is okay—it creases easily, which I don't mind. Compared to other Jordans, like a Jordan 4, these are much lighter and less bulky. Pro: Iconic style that goes with everything. Con: The flat outsole isn't great for wet surfaces. Recommended for collectors and casual wearers alike. If you're new to sneakers, the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is a perfect start. This 'Chicago' inspired colorway pops! The build feels good, not cheap. Wearing them, they're true to size with a snug forefoot. Compared to modern Jordan models, these are flat and firm – not for long walks, in my opinion. But for looking fresh? 10/10. Definitely a closet staple.

• Shown: Bred Toe
• Style: CT8529-012