Air jordan 1 mid : Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle [vlfv62du]

It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget. Unboxing this 'Triple White' "Air Jordan 1 Mid" – wow, these are crisp. The leather has a nice grain. Sliding them on, the ankle collar is padded just enough. They feel more flexible than older Mids I've owned. The all-white look is a summer killer, but be warned: they'll get dirty fast. A great, affordable alternative to the High OG versions, for sure. Comparing it directly to an AJ1 High? You lose some of that dramatic, high-top look. But you gain easier on-and-off and a slightly more casual vibe. For $120-130 USD, the Mid is often the smarter buy. My final take? The Air Jordan 1 Mid is perfect for sneaker newcomers, or anyone who wants a versatile, iconic shoe without breaking the bank. It's a workhorse. Comparing it to my other Jordans… The "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is noticeably lighter than an AJ1 High, and "way" less bulky than something like a Jordan 4. The simplicity is its strength. The break-in period was minimal for me—maybe one full day of wear. However, that also means less padding. It’s a trade-off. I’d recommend these for a sneaker rotation, not as your only, all-purpose shoe. Perfect for casual hangs, not for long walks.

• Shown: Royal Toe
• Style: CT8012-011