This "Chicago Black Toe" look is fire, and at around $125 USD, it's way more accessible than an OG High. The leather quality is okay—it creases easily, which I don't mind. Compared to other Jordans, like a Jordan 4, these are much lighter and less bulky. Pro: Iconic style that goes with everything. Con: The flat outsole isn't great for wet surfaces. Recommended for collectors and casual wearers alike. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle. It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget. Honestly, the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is a workhorse. This "Bred" color-blocking is just fire, straight up. The build is tough, the toe box creases – that's part of the charm. Compared to Dunks, I find the AJ1 Mid has a slightly more structured feel. Biggest pro? Its absolute versatility in any fit. The potential downside? It can feel a bit "basic" given how many are out there. Still, for the price in the "Jordan series", it's a no-brainer casual shoe. Who should maybe look elsewhere? Serious comfort seekers — try something with more modern tech. Also, if you have very wide feet, the fit might be too restrictive. And if you're a die-hard OG Jordan 1 High fan who thinks the Mid "isn't the same," well, you already know your answer.
