Air jordan 1 mid : Comparing it directly to a Jordan 1 High OG [w2otxklj]

.. the main difference is obvious: the collar height. The Mid cuts off just above the ankle bone. For me, it actually makes putting them on a bit easier. Some purists will always prefer the High's look, but for lifestyle wear, this Air Jordan 1 Mid is often more practical (and sometimes more affordable). Okay, putting these "Air Jordan 1 Mids" to the test. This "Chicago Black Toe" look is fire, and at around $125 USD, it's way more accessible than an OG High. The leather quality is okay—it creases easily, which I don't mind. Compared to other Jordans, like a Jordan 4, these are much lighter and less bulky. Pro: Iconic style that goes with everything. Con: The flat outsole isn't great for wet surfaces. Recommended for collectors and casual wearers alike. Sliding these on… the fit is true to size for me. The ankle collar on the "air jordan 1 mid" is definitely lower than the Highs, which gives a different feel—less restrictive, honestly. The cushioning? Let’s be real, it’s firm. You’re not buying these for cloud-like comfort; you’re buying them for the look and the heritage. That’s just the truth with most Jordans from this era. Let’s talk pros and cons, real quick. "Pro": Iconic style, easy to wear, and a relatively lower price point for a "Jordan" product. "Con": The footbed is pretty basic… zero break-in pain for me, but don’t expect amazing arch support. It’s a flat-feeling shoe. So, who's it for? Someone wanting that classic sneaker look without the High-top price tag. Not for folks needing all-day, walk-everywhere comfort.

• Shown: Tie-dye
• Style: DB4612-300