The main con is the materials can be hit or miss. Some colorways use nicer leather, others use stiffer stuff. This one's okay. Also, if you have wide feet, go up half a size for sure. The break-in period is real. But once they mold to your foot, they're great. It's a classic for a reason, even in its Mid form. Unboxing the air jordan 1 mid — this "Mid 'Bred'" colorway ($125 USD) — I was impressed by the bold black and red! The Jordan series classic shines here. On foot, the traction is good, but the cushioning? Honestly, it's firm — you might want to add an insole. Compared to AJ1 Lows, it offers more ankle coverage. Pros: eye-catching and easy to match. Cons: break-in time needed. Best for fashion, not for all-day comfort. A solid addition! Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Barely Orange' – wow, the color is vibrant! It's a summer-ready vibe straight out of the box. Construction feels standard for the line – durable and well-put-together. On-foot, they're lightweight and easy to move in, which I appreciate. The mid-cut provides good ankle support for casual use without feeling restrictive. The major pro here is the bold, standout color – perfect for adding a pop to neutral fits. The con? Such a bright color can be harder to style daily, and it might show dirt easily. I'd recommend this to anyone wanting to add a fun, seasonal color to their rotation. If you prefer only neutral, go-to-everything sneakers, this loud "Air Jordan 1 Mid" might not be your daily driver. Final thoughts - is it worth it? For me, yes. The "Air Jordan 1 Mid" offers that legendary look at a more accessible point. The 'Metallic Silver' is a sleek, versatile colorway. It's a sneaker you'll wear for years. If you like the style and accept its classic (firm) feel, it's an easy recommendation. Cop it.

  • Shown: Rookie Of The Year
  • Style: 555088-603

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5