The blue leather looks sharp in hand. Slipping them on... immediate feedback: they're supportive, but "man" that forefoot is stiff. The weight is noticeable – it's a substantial shoe. In natural light, the colors really shine. Compared to a Jordan 1 Low, the Mid offers more ankle... "presence". Love it for the classic aesthetic and versatility. Don't love it for long-distance walking. Verdict? A solid pick for casual wear, but know what you're signing up for: style over supreme comfort. Now, the cons — because nothing's perfect. That firm cushioning I mentioned? It's a deal-breaker if you prioritize plush comfort. Also, the toe box can feel a bit narrow for some foot shapes. And while the leather is decent, on some colorways it can be a bit stiff and crease noticeably. Just keeping it real. Trying these on, the air jordan 1 mid provides a classic, locked-down feel – it's what you expect from the Jordan series! The Black/White配色 is a safe bet that always looks good. At $125, the price point is reasonable for a Mid. However, the insole isn't the most supportive for long periods. Advantage? That unbeatable silhouette. Drawback? Limited innovation in comfort. Ideal for style enthusiasts and those new to Jordans; not the best for people needing arch support or extensive cushioning. Yo, opening the box right now... and wow, this "Black Toe" "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is fire. The color-blocking is "perfect". On foot, they're true to size with a solid, locked-down feel. It's a sturdy shoe, no doubt — you feel connected to the ground. Is it the most comfortable Jordan? Nope, not even close to a Jordan 13, for example. But for a style icon that goes with literally anything? It's a classic for a reason. If you're new to the Jordan series, this is a fantastic, relatively affordable entry point.

  • Shown: University Blue
  • Style: 555088-007

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5