Pros: Unbeatable style. The "OG" high-top is iconic for a reason. Build quality is usually consistent. It's a versatile sneaker that works with tons of fits. Cons, like I said: comfort isn't one of them. It's a flat, firm ride. Also, the creasing... the leather will crease, no way around it. If you're a comfort-first person, this classic "Air Jordan 1" might disappoint you on foot. Alright, so I just got the "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG" in the ‘University Blue’ colorway, and the box is right here... Let's go. First impression? The build quality feels solid – that classic leather has a nice grain to it. The shape, especially the toe box, looks "so" much better than some of the recent retros. The color blocking is just... clean. It’s a timeless look, honestly. At around $180 USD, you're paying for that legacy, no doubt. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG" is the blueprint. Next to an AJ3 or AJ4, it's noticeably less cushioned. It's lighter than an AJ6, but more restrictive than an AJ11 in terms of flexibility. You get this shoe for the history and style, not performance tech. That's its main advantage - it's the originator. The downside? That same lack of modern comfort might be a dealbreaker for some. Here’s my take on the Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG. Opening it up, the silhouette just commands respect—it’s so simple yet powerful. I went true to size, and the break-in is necessary but worth it. On camera, the colors always pop. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 has a sharper, more aggressive toe box and better materials (usually). The pro is its legendary status and versatility. The con is the dated tech. For a casual wearer who loves style? Go for it. For an athlete or someone with foot issues? Maybe not.
