The high-top collar gives a secure feel, but it's break-in time for sure. Compared to a Jordan 1 Low, it's definitely more substantial. I love how this specific OG model stays true to the original 1985 specs. Is it worth the price? For a core colorway like this? In my opinion - yes. You're buying a piece of the Jordan legacy. Alright, let's get into these "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG". First off, the box is classic - I always love that. Pulling these "Bred" or "Black Toe" colorways out? The leather feels pretty decent for a GR release. The shape is on point, that iconic "OG" silhouette just doesn't get old. For around "$180 USD", the presentation is solid. You're buying into the history, the look - it's an instant classic in hand, no doubt. Alright, a quick on-foot of the classic "'Chicago' Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG". Honestly? The red and white just "never" get old. The leather is stiff out of the box, which is typical. Walking in them, you get that "secure" feel, but you definitely feel the court heritage—it’s not a "all-day-everyday" comfort shoe. At its core, this is a "piece of history". Worth the current resell (which is high!)? For a die-hard fan, maybe. For a casual wearer looking for comfort? Probably not. It's for the "O.G. enthusiast". Final verdict? The "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG" is a legend for a reason. The优点: iconic style, quality materials (usually), and ultimate versatility. The cons: break-in period, basic comfort, and the price ($180) is for the name/history. I recommend it for collectors, fashion lovers, and anyone building a sneaker rotation. I "don't" recommend it as your only pair of shoes if you're on your feet all day. It’s a classic, but it’s not trying to be something it’s not – and I respect that.

  • Shown: Patent Bred
  • Style: CT8012-005

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5