A Jordan 4 or 5 has more tech and cushioning. This is raw, old-school. The break-in period is real, unlike a Jordan 11, which feels more refined out of the box. But that’s the charm – it’s a piece of history. If you're new to the Jordan series, this is where you start to understand the hype. My honest take? The "air jordan 1 retro high og" is a legend, but it's not perfect. The materials feel durable, which is a plus. The downside? That firm midsole - don't expect Boost or ZoomX here. It's a trade-off: iconic style vs. modern comfort. For casual wear and collecting, it's a 10/10. For all-day walking tours? Maybe not your first choice. Know what you're getting into. Talking pros & cons? Major pro: style. It's arguably the most influential sneaker "ever". The construction on this retro is generally good. Con? The comfort - or lack thereof. If you need plush cushioning for all-day wear, look elsewhere. Also, the leather quality can vary between releases. For $180, you hope for the best. Personally? I think it's worth it for the iconic status. Wearing these 'Bred' Air Jordan 1 Retro High OGs out today. The upper is sturdy, offering decent support for all-day wear. Compared to a newer Jordan like the 5 or 13, the tech is basic—no Zoom air, just a simple sole. But that's not the point! The point is the iconic look & the versatility. Pros? Goes with everything. Cons? The insole is pretty basic. I'd recommend these to any sneakerhead starting their collection.
