Also, if you have wider feet, the fit can be snug. And if you're on a tight budget—$180+ is a lot for a shoe with '90s tech. There are more comfortable and affordable options out there, for sure. This is a "want", not a "need". Putting it on foot really shows off that profile. The high-top collar gives a secure feel, but it's break-in time for sure. Compared to a Jordan 1 Low, it's definitely more substantial. I love how this specific OG model stays true to the original 1985 specs. Is it worth the price? For a core colorway like this? In my opinion - yes. You're buying a piece of the Jordan legacy. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "air jordan 1 retro high og" is the blueprint. Next to a Jordan 4, it's lighter and less bulky. Versus a Jordan 3? It lacks the visible Air cushioning. It's the most "flat" in feel, but also the most stylistically flexible. Pros? Timeless design, endless colorways, goes with everything. Cons? That classic feel means a stiffer break-in period. Not for everyone's daily comfort needs. First impression of this Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG silhouette? "So" clean. The high-top profile is legendary for a reason. I'm wearing a neutral colorway, and it's incredibly easy to style. The ankle support is real—great for casual wear. Downsides? They can feel a bit heavy & clunky at first. Not the best for wide feet, either. Worth $180? For a foundational sneaker in your rotation, absolutely. For performance basketball? Obviously not.
