Unboxing, I love the mix of white, grey, and that hit of red. It’s a clean, "summery" look. On foot, the fit is snug—I’d say maybe "half-size up" if you have wider feet. The silhouette is just "untouchable" for streetwear. For the "$180 USD" price tag, you're paying for the legacy and look. It’s a great entry into the Jordan 1 world. However, if you’re coming from ultra-comfy runners, the break-in period might feel a bit stiff. Here’s my take after wearing the 'Bordeaux' OG Highs all day. The优点? Timeless style, incredibly versatile for outfits, and the build quality (on most releases) is dependable. They feel durable. The possible downside? That lack of modern comfort tech. If you're used to React or Zoom, these will feel "very" firm. At around $180 USD, you're buying the icon status. I’d recommend them for sneakerheads and style-first folks, but maybe not for anyone needing all-day, walk-everywhere comfort. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "air jordan 1 retro high og" is the blueprint. Next to a Jordan 4, it's lighter and less bulky. Versus a Jordan 3? It lacks the visible Air cushioning. It's the most "flat" in feel, but also the most stylistically flexible. Pros? Timeless design, endless colorways, goes with everything. Cons? That classic feel means a stiffer break-in period. Not for everyone's daily comfort needs. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG" is the blueprint. Next to an AJ3 or AJ4, it's noticeably less cushioned. It's lighter than an AJ6, but more restrictive than an AJ11 in terms of flexibility. You get this shoe for the history and style, not performance tech. That's its main advantage - it's the originator. The downside? That same lack of modern comfort might be a dealbreaker for some.

  • Shown: Chrome
  • Style: DZ5485-410

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5