Terms of the offer
Whether it's $180 or resale, you're paying for the icon status. On foot, it's style over substance (comfort-wise). It suits anyone building a sneaker rotation based on classics. It does NOT suit someone needing cushioning or wide-foot comfort. For me? A must-have for the culture, but manage your expectations. Just copped this Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG "Bred Patent". The glossy patent leather is "striking" in person – way more than in pictures. However, that shine does mean less flexibility. They're definitely stiffer than the standard leather versions. For $200, you're paying for that bold, head-turning look. If you love a shiny finish and don't mind the break-in period, these are for you. If you prefer a softer, broken-in feel from day one? Maybe pass on this specific pair. Just got my hands on the new Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG in this neutral grey. "Unboxing" it, the leather has a nice texture. On foot, honestly, it feels like... a classic Jordan 1. It's supportive but the cushioning? Basic. The beauty is in the design & how it completes a fit. Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, it's less comfortable but more iconic in profile. A great canvas for outfits. Not for performance, purely for fashion. Honest review time. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is a legend, but it's not for everyone. My pair here feels well-made, no glue issues. When I walk, the lack of arch support is noticeable if you're used to modern sneakers. The pro? Unmatched style points and durability. The con? It's not a "comfort-first" shoe. It's a fashion and culture icon. If you want a piece of sneaker history you can wear, go for it. If your priority is all-day comfort tech, maybe skip this one.
- Shown: Obsidian
- Style: DX2836-001
