The leather on these 'Court Purples' has a nicer grain. Is it worth the extra cash over a Mid? For a purist, probably yes. But if you're just dipping your toes into the "Jordan" series, a Mid is a fantastic and more affordable starting point. Just my two cents! Comparing it directly to, say, a "Jordan 3" - the difference is huge. The 3 has that Air unit in the heel (softer!). The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is more about that flat, grounded court feel. It's a different era of design. I love both, but for pure, historical "impact" and outfit versatility, the 1 is still king for me. Just my two cents. Opening this box, the shape of the Air Jordan 1 Retro is the first thing that grabs me. It's just... "the" silhouette, you know? The craftsmanship on my pair is clean - no glue stains or major flaws. Wearing them, they're definitely heavier than modern sneakers, but it gives them a substantial feel. They're a statement piece. I'd recommend them to any sneakerhead building a collection, but not as your only pair of shoes. Let's get into these! The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" Low 'Black Toe'. Priced at $100, it's a more accessible entry into the silhouette. Opening the box, the color-blocking is just iconic—it translates so well to the low-top. On foot, they're light and easy to slip on. The comfort is... still basic, but the low cut gives you more ankle freedom. For everyday errands or a casual vibe, they're great. Compared to the High version, you lose some of that dramatic look but gain practicality. Pro? Iconic look at a better price point. Con? Still not a comfort powerhouse, and some think lows are less "special." I'd recommend these to anyone who loves the AJ1 style but wants a more low-key, summer-ready option.
