The 'Stage Haze' colorway with that grey and white just looks so clean in video. The "air jordan 1 retro" has such a photogenic profile from every angle. Is the materials premium? Ehh, it's mid-tier. But the "overall aesthetic"? Chef's kiss. It's a shoe built for the 'gram and YouTube thumbnails. Finally, let's look at this Air Jordan 1 Retro 'Stage Haze'. Unboxing, I love the aged midsole and the mix of white, grey, and black—it has a vintage feel right away. On foot, it's the same reliable Jordan 1 fit and feel. The pre-yellowed look means you don't have to worry about keeping it pristine! Compared to a crisp, all-white AJ1, this has more character from day one. Pro: Great distressed aesthetic that hides wear. Con: The style isn't for everyone; some prefer a clean, new look. Ideal for fans of the "already lived-in" trend. Not ideal for those who want their sneakers to look brand new forever. Unboxing the 'Pine Green' pair, and the leather has a nice tumbled look. Lacing up this "air jordan 1 retro", the arch support is noticeable (for better or worse). In terms of look, it's a clean, classic block color. Love it for that. Price is standard for the line. The main advantage is its iconic design language. The disadvantage? It can feel a bit "clunky" until broken in. Ideal for style enthusiasts; not ideal for performance athletes or comfort-seekers. Just got the 'University Blue' pair in. Opening the box, that color "pops"! It's a beautiful, simple two-tone look. As a classic "air jordan 1 retro", the silhouette is perfect. On foot, the fit is true, but that flat, firm midsole? Yeah, it's not for everyone—especially if you're coming from something like an AJ11. Love it for photos and casual fits, but I wouldn't recommend it for actual court play or long walks. A style piece, through and through.

  • Shown: Stealth
  • Style: DM9036-104

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5