The mix of materials is cool – leather, canvas. On foot, they're lighter than I expected! The fit is standard for the Jordan 1 line. Visually, they're a great summer shoe. The flat cushioning is the biggest drawback, honestly. If you're used to plush sneakers, you'll notice it immediately. Great for casual wear, terrible for long periods on your feet. My verdict? A solid pick for a unique colorway in the iconic silhouette. Here’s the real talk on the on-feet feel. Laced up these "Air Jordan 1 Retro" highs, and... yeah, the comfort is... fine? It's a classic basketball shoe from the '80s, so don't expect modern foam. The ankle lockdown is great! But the footbed is firm. Compared to, say, a Jordan 4? It's definitely less forgiving for all-day wear. That's just the truth of this model, you know? Okay, the Air Jordan 1 Retro "Taxi" colorway. That yellow is bright and "chef's kiss". Unboxing it, the leather quality seems a step above some recent releases – nice and tumbled. Once laced up, you get that iconic, locked-down feel. The advantage? Instant outfit completer. The potential drawback? That bold yellow isn't for the faint of heart. At $180, it's a statement piece. I'd recommend it to anyone wanting to add a vibrant classic to their rotation, but it might be too loud for a minimalist wardrobe. What's up, everyone? First impression of this "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'Shadow'? Super clean and versatile. The materials are nice, good quality for the price – which is around $180 USD. Slipping them on, the fit is true-to-size, decent lockdown. Compared to a newer J like the AJ5, it's definitely less padded. Big pro here: you can wear these with literally anything. The possible downside? That flat footbed. Perfect for style enthusiasts, but maybe not for folks who prioritize supreme comfort above all.

  • Shown: Stealth
  • Style: CT8527-700

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5