Air jordan 1 retro : First impressions of this Air Jordan 1 Retro 'Bred Patent'? The glossy finish is a bold choice, for sure [6d4teerr]

On feet, it's the same familiar fit — supportive, a bit heavy — but that shiny leather creases in a unique way. Compared to a standard leather Jordan 1, it's definitely more attention-grabbing. Major pro? Incredible visual pop on camera. Potential con? The patent material isn't for purists. At ~$200, I'd recommend it if you want to stand out. Skip it if you prefer muted classics. On foot now. The fit is true to size for me, offering that snug, secure wrap the "Jordan 1" is known for. But let's be real—the comfort isn't modern. It's a flat, firm ride compared to newer Js. Big pro? The style is unbeatable. Con? Your feet might crave more cushion after a few hours. Final thoughts on this "Air Jordan 1 Retro". It's the 'Bred Toe' today. The quality check is good – no glue stains I can see. My true-to-size fit is perfect. Once on, they feel… classic. The arch support is minimal, guys. The pro is its unmatched position in sneaker culture and ultra-clean color-blocking. The con is the outdated technology at a premium price. If you want a piece of history and a versatile shoe, go for it. If modern comfort is key, this isn't your model. That's my real take. Let's talk on-feet experience. This "Air Jordan 1 Retro" model, in this 'Shadow' grey, is arguably one of the most wearable. The support is fantastic for casual wear. However, the insole is basic, and the shoe has some weight to it – not heavy, but you feel it. Where it "really" wins? Its profile. It just looks good from every angle, on or off camera. For a first Jordan, or a wardrobe staple, it's a 10/10. If you're sensitive to a stiff sole, be warned.

• Shown: University Blue
• Style: DN3707-160