The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'Mid' 'Chicago Black Toe'. Even as a Mid, the shape is great. For $135, it's a more accessible entry into the silhouette. On foot, they feel the same as the Highs: stylish but firm. The ankle support is less, which some might prefer. They look sharp with jeans or shorts. Honestly, the main advantage is the price point and classic color-blocking. Disadvantage? Same old, non-supportive footbed. A good option for a budget-conscious fan. Okay, so here's the Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG in 'Obsidian'. Unboxing thoughts? The white leather is smooth, and that university blue hits perfectly—such a clean summer vibe. On feet, the break-in is real, folks. Initial steps are a bit rigid, but the lockdown is fantastic. This colorway looks incredible in natural light, way better than in stock photos. Compared to a Jordan 1 Mid, the quality here feels a step up. Pro: Extremely versatile and well-made. Con: That break-in period can be tough. Perfect for anyone building a versatile sneaker rotation. Not ideal if you need a shoe that's comfortable right out of the box. Alright, on-feet time. Slip into this Air Jordan 1 Retro, and... well, it's firm. Let's be real — the comfort is not modern. The ankle collar is stiff initially, and the cushioning is minimal. But the "lockdown"? Incredible. My foot feels secure and the shape it creates is "chef's kiss". If you prioritize looks over cloud-like feel, this is it. Just don't expect Boost or React, okay? On feet now. The fit is true to size for me. The break-in period is real, folks – they're stiff at first! The cushioning? Don't expect Boost or Zoom Air. It's a firm, flat feel, which I actually like for all-day wear. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is more about style than modern performance, and that's okay.

  • Shown: Cool Grey
  • Style: CT8529-003

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5