Comfort-wise? Let's be real - the "air jordan 1 retro" is not a modern cushioning king. You feel that firm, classic ride. The ankle collar gives a snug, secure wrap though. Compared to something like a Jordan 3 or 4? It's definitely less plush underfoot. But for style points? It's a 10/10. Comparing these to, say, a "Jordan 1 Mid" – the "Retro" high-top just feels more substantial and "correct" to me. The leather on these 'Court Purples' has a nicer grain. Is it worth the extra cash over a Mid? For a purist, probably yes. But if you're just dipping your toes into the "Jordan" series, a Mid is a fantastic and more affordable starting point. Just my two cents! The major pro for me is the versatility. This 'Court Purple' "AJ1" literally goes with half my closet. The build quality on this specific retro is pretty good—no major glue stains or wonky stitching on my pair. For $180 in the Jordan series, that's what you hope for. The con? That flat, firm ride. If you need plush cushioning for long walks, this isn't your shoe. It's a style-first model. Alright, on-feet review time. These are the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'University Blue'. Let's be transparent: you buy this for the look, period. The leather is okay, the insole is basic. They feel sturdy, but not "comfortable" in a 2024 way. Styling them is a breeze – they elevate almost any fit. Compared to a Jordan 5? It's a world of difference in cushioning. I recommend them for their style legacy. I don't recommend them as your primary walking shoe. Simple as that.