The 'Bred' colorway, especially, just has that "undeniable" aura. Cons? As mentioned, the footbed is stiff—break-in time is real. Also, at around $180, it's not a "performance" shoe, so manage your expectations for all-day wear. Alright, so, I just unboxed these "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'Bred' — yep, the classic! The leather feels solid, maybe not super-buttery, but the color-blocking? Iconic. On feet, it's that familiar feel: a bit stiff (as expected) but the ankle support is top-notch. Honestly, it's a statement piece. Pros? Timeless look & incredible history. Cons? The comfort isn't modern. If you're new to the Jordan series, this is a must-have for your collection. But if you need cushioning for all-day wear... look elsewhere. So, I just got these in. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'Mid' 'Chicago Black Toe'. Even as a Mid, the shape is great. For $135, it's a more accessible entry into the silhouette. On foot, they feel the same as the Highs: stylish but firm. The ankle support is less, which some might prefer. They look sharp with jeans or shorts. Honestly, the main advantage is the price point and classic color-blocking. Disadvantage? Same old, non-supportive footbed. A good option for a budget-conscious fan. On feet, walking around? They look even better. The high-top shape is so flattering. Comparing it to a newer Jordan, like an AJ37, it's night and day in terms of tech - but for pure style, the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" wins every time. The pros? Unbeatable looks, incredible versatility for outfits. The cons? Your feet might complain after a long day.

  • Shown: Infrared
  • Style: 555088-134

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5