Air jordan 1 retro : First impressions of this Air Jordan 1 Retro 'Bred Patent'? The glossy finish is a bold choice, for sure [e8dexkcd]

On feet, it's the same familiar fit — supportive, a bit heavy — but that shiny leather creases in a unique way. Compared to a standard leather Jordan 1, it's definitely more attention-grabbing. Major pro? Incredible visual pop on camera. Potential con? The patent material isn't for purists. At ~$200, I'd recommend it if you want to stand out. Skip it if you prefer muted classics. Opening this 'Court Purple' box… that color is vibrant! Classic AJ1 construction—good, not perfect. Slip them on, and the heel lockdown is excellent. Honestly, they feel a bit "heavy" compared to some modern trainers. The style, though? Timeless. Pro: you get a bold, statement piece. Con: the toe box can crease pretty easily. I'd recommend these to anyone wanting a pop of color in their rotation. If you hate creases, maybe consider that. Yo, check out this pair! The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'Shadow 2.0'. Opening the box, the grey and black combo is so subtle yet powerful—a perfect everyday shoe. Price was about $170. On foot, the fit is perfect for me (I went TTS), and the lockdown is good. But I have to be honest: after wearing Zoom Air sneakers all day, putting these on feels... basic. There's not much going on underfoot. The design is flawless, a true staple in the "Jordan" lineage. Pro? Unbeatable, wearable design. Con? You're paying for the name and silhouette, not groundbreaking comfort. I'd say these are perfect for someone building a versatile rotation. If comfort is your #1 priority, you might be disappointed. Comparing it directly to, say, a "Jordan 3" - the difference is huge. The 3 has that Air unit in the heel (softer!). The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is more about that flat, grounded court feel. It's a different era of design. I love both, but for pure, historical "impact" and outfit versatility, the 1 is still king for me. Just my two cents.

• Shown: Pure Money
• Style: DN3707-160