Super soft leather on the overlays. Sliding my foot in, the padding around the ankle is great. It’s a subtle colorway that looks even better in person than in photos. Compared to brighter Jordans, this is a stealth flex. Big pro: top-tier craftsmanship on this specific release. Possible downside? It's another high-top at around $180, so same old break-in period. Worth it? Yes, for quality seekers. No, if you're tired of the AJ1 high model. Unboxing the 'Pine Green' pair, and the leather has a nice tumbled look. Lacing up this "air jordan 1 retro", the arch support is noticeable (for better or worse). In terms of look, it's a clean, classic block color. Love it for that. Price is standard for the line. The main advantage is its iconic design language. The disadvantage? It can feel a bit "clunky" until broken in. Ideal for style enthusiasts; not ideal for performance athletes or comfort-seekers. Opening this box, the Chicago colorway of the Air Jordan 1 Retro is just iconic, right? That white/red/black combo is timeless. Sliding them on, you notice the ankle support immediately – it's a structured shoe. Compared to newer Jordans, the tech is basic, but that's the point! Pros? Versatility and history. Cons? The leather can crease easily. For $200, it's a cornerstone for any collection, but maybe not for your long walking days. Opening the box on this ‘Court Purple’ Air Jordan 1 Retro… the colors really pop in person! The shape is on point this year. Wearing them, they feel true to size—secure, not too heavy. The major "pro"? Timeless style. The "con"? They crease easily, and the comfort is just average. If you want a shoe that goes with everything and screams “sneakerhead,” this is it. If comfort is your #1 priority, I’d say skip it.

  • Shown: Infrared
  • Style: DN3707-160

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5