The toe box creases, sure, but it adds character. The outsole rubber is thick and should last forever with casual use. Compared to newer "Jordan" models with more tech, like the 34 or 36, these are about style and history, not performance. That's not a bad thing – it's just what they are. Comparing it to a newer Jordan, like a 36? Totally different worlds. The AJ1 is about heritage and flat-footed stability. The newer models are for actual basketball. So, it depends on your need. For casual wear and collecting, the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is still king for many. Here's my take after a full day in these. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" breaks in nicely, becoming more comfortable over time. The leather softens up. However, that initial stiffness is real. On camera, the shoe's proportions are perfect – it's why it's so photogenic. Compared to a low-top version, you get more support. The advantage is its sheer iconic status and how it completes a fit. The disadvantage is breathability; it can get warm. Great for fall/winter, maybe too much for summer. Fresh delivery! This is the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" High OG 'Bred Patent'... the $200 one. First impression? SHINY. The patent leather makes it a completely different beast—it's loud and feels almost formal. Quality seems good, no major flaws. Sliding them on, the patent is less forgiving than regular leather, so break-in might be tougher. They're stiff, no surprise there. On foot, they command attention; the red just pops. Compared to the matte 'Bred' version, this is for a different mood—more of a special occasion shoe. Pro? Unmatched visual impact and rarity. Con? The price and the potentially uncomfortable patent crease. Get these if you want a show-stopper. Avoid if you prefer understated style or have a tight budget.
