Air jordan 1 retro : Walking around in them, you feel connected to the ground – some people hate that, I kinda like it for casual wear [iahtce0y]

The ankle support is excellent, a signature of the high-top "Jordan 1 Retro". They do have some weight to them, though; they're not ultra-light. If you're used to flyknit or mesh sneakers, you'll definitely notice the heft. It's part of the classic feel, for better or worse. So, final verdict? For a first-time Jordan buyer, the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" high is a fantastic starting point. It's the most recognizable model in the Jordan series for a reason. It teaches you about the history. But if you're an athlete or someone who's on their feet 12 hours a day, your money ($180 USD) is better spent on something with more modern tech. This is a lifestyle shoe, period. The pros? Iconic design, incredible versatility for outfits, and a build that feels like it'll last. The 'Bred' colorway, especially, just has that "undeniable" aura. Cons? As mentioned, the footbed is stiff—break-in time is real. Also, at around $180, it's not a "performance" shoe, so manage your expectations for all-day wear. Comparing these to, say, a "Jordan 1 Mid" – the "Retro" high-top just feels more substantial and "correct" to me. The leather on these 'Court Purples' has a nicer grain. Is it worth the extra cash over a Mid? For a purist, probably yes. But if you're just dipping your toes into the "Jordan" series, a Mid is a fantastic and more affordable starting point. Just my two cents!

• Shown: Obsidian
• Style: DJ5718-300