The grey and black leather is so versatile. Slipping them on, the break-in period is real; they're stiff at first. Compared to a modern Jordan, like the 37, the tech is decades apart. Huge pro? Timeless looks. Con? Not for long walks. Perfect for collectors, not for comfort-seekers. What's up, everyone? Let's talk about this new "Air Jordan 1 Retro" High OG I copped. This is the 'Dark Mocha' version, sitting around $170. Unboxing it, you "immediately" get that premium vibe—the suede hits and leather panels just look & feel great. Sliding them on, the ankle collar provides solid support, but let's be real: the footbed is firm. It's not a "comfort shoe" in the modern sense. Visually, though? "Chef's kiss". They pop on camera and in person. Compared to some of the newer, tech-heavy Jordans, the 1 is all about the look. Big pro is its versatility for fits. Con is the lack of modern cushioning. Worth it? For sneakerheads who appreciate the history—100%. For performance? Nah. Just got my hands on the new Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG in this neutral grey. "Unboxing" it, the leather has a nice texture. On foot, honestly, it feels like... a classic Jordan 1. It's supportive but the cushioning? Basic. The beauty is in the design & how it completes a fit. Compared to a Jordan 3 or 4, it's less comfortable but more iconic in profile. A great canvas for outfits. Not for performance, purely for fashion. So, this "Air Jordan 1 Retro" 'Pine Green' just arrived. The materials feel good – solid leather, no major flaws. Fit is TTS for me, good heel lockdown. Aesthetically, the green is a really fresh alternative to the usual colors. Standing next to my AJ4s, the 1 is just more versatile for daily fits. Major pro: unique yet classic colorway. A possible downside for some? The price (around $180 USD) for a retro tech platform. Great for adding color to your rotation, not ideal as your only "comfort" shoe.

  • Shown: Defining Moments
  • Style: DZ5485-410

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5