Air jordan 1 retro : Comparing it directly to, say, a "Jordan 3" - the difference is huge [nnh2rdtr]

The 3 has that Air unit in the heel (softer!). The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is more about that flat, grounded court feel. It's a different era of design. I love both, but for pure, historical "impact" and outfit versatility, the 1 is still king for me. Just my two cents. Just copped this Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG "Bred Patent". The glossy patent leather is "striking" in person – way more than in pictures. However, that shine does mean less flexibility. They're definitely stiffer than the standard leather versions. For $200, you're paying for that bold, head-turning look. If you love a shiny finish and don't mind the break-in period, these are for you. If you prefer a softer, broken-in feel from day one? Maybe pass on this specific pair. Performance? As a lifestyle shoe, it’s great. Secure fit, flat base, good for driving. As a "basketball" shoe? It's 1985 tech - don't even try it. The "air jordan 1 retro" is a cultural icon first, a footwear tool second. If you're looking for modern performance from the Jordan series, look at the 36s or 37s. This is pure style. Final verdict? I'm keeping these. The "air jordan 1 retro", like this 'Heritage' pair, is a cornerstone. Worth the "$180 USD"? If you value timeless design, yes. If you prioritize cloud-like comfort, look elsewhere. It's perfect for collectors and casual wearers who appreciate the legacy. Just maybe wear thicker socks the first few times!

• Shown: Pollen
• Style: DH7138-006