.. okay, immediate thoughts. The fit is "true-to-size" for me. The ankle padding and overall build give a really secure, locked-down feel. It's that classic "Air Jordan 1 Retro" experience: supportive, but let's be real—not the most cushioned. You're buying the look and the legacy here, not cloud-like comfort. Okay, the Air Jordan 1 Retro "Taxi" colorway. That yellow is bright and "chef's kiss". Unboxing it, the leather quality seems a step above some recent releases – nice and tumbled. Once laced up, you get that iconic, locked-down feel. The advantage? Instant outfit completer. The potential drawback? That bold yellow isn't for the faint of heart. At $180, it's a statement piece. I'd recommend it to anyone wanting to add a vibrant classic to their rotation, but it might be too loud for a minimalist wardrobe. Fresh delivery! This is the "Air Jordan 1 Retro" High OG 'Bred Patent'... the $200 one. First impression? SHINY. The patent leather makes it a completely different beast—it's loud and feels almost formal. Quality seems good, no major flaws. Sliding them on, the patent is less forgiving than regular leather, so break-in might be tougher. They're stiff, no surprise there. On foot, they command attention; the red just pops. Compared to the matte 'Bred' version, this is for a different mood—more of a special occasion shoe. Pro? Unmatched visual impact and rarity. Con? The price and the potentially uncomfortable patent crease. Get these if you want a show-stopper. Avoid if you prefer understated style or have a tight budget. Seeing this 'Bred' colorway in-hand... wow. The red hits are vibrant. On-court? No, I wouldn't play in these – they're purely a lifestyle piece now. But for creating a classic sneaker fit, nothing beats it. It's a piece of history you can wear.

  • Shown: Cherry
  • Style: CU1110-010

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5