Super soft leather on the overlays. Sliding my foot in, the padding around the ankle is great. It’s a subtle colorway that looks even better in person than in photos. Compared to brighter Jordans, this is a stealth flex. Big pro: top-tier craftsmanship on this specific release. Possible downside? It's another high-top at around $180, so same old break-in period. Worth it? Yes, for quality seekers. No, if you're tired of the AJ1 high model. Opening this box, the shape of the Air Jordan 1 Retro is the first thing that grabs me. It's just... "the" silhouette, you know? The craftsmanship on my pair is clean - no glue stains or major flaws. Wearing them, they're definitely heavier than modern sneakers, but it gives them a substantial feel. They're a statement piece. I'd recommend them to any sneakerhead building a collection, but not as your only pair of shoes. Final verdict on the Air Jordan 1 Retro? It's a legend for a reason. The design is iconic & goes with literally everything in your wardrobe. However, you have to manage expectations: it's not a comfortable shoe by today's standards. The materials can be hit or miss depending on the release. Worth it for sneaker enthusiasts and style-focused people. Not worth it if you're purely seeking comfort or modern performance features. It's a style icon, plain and simple. Just got these in, and the silhouette is still "so" sharp. The build quality feels consistent. Putting them on, the toe box has nice room, no pinching. The main drawback people talk about is true: the cushioning is basic. You don't buy an "Air Jordan 1 Retro" for bounce, you buy it for the look and the legacy. It's a piece of art you can walk in. I'd recommend it to any sneaker enthusiast building a foundation. I wouldn't recommend it as your only gym or walking shoe.

  • Shown: Cherry
  • Style: CT8529-410

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5