The colors are vibrant—no filter needed! For about $170 USD, you know what you're getting. On-foot feel is identical to every other retro 1: break-in required. The pro is its statement-making ability. The con is the lack of modern tech. It's a simple comparison: choose these for history and aesthetics; choose a Jordan 11 or 12 for more cushioning and a different kind of comfort. Opening the box, the shape of this "air jordan 1 retro" is perfect – no toe box weirdness. This 'Stage Haze' pair has a great mix of materials. Wearing them, the high-top feels supportive, not restrictive. The major advantage is its place in sneaker history – it's an icon. The possible deal-breaker? The price (approx. $180) for a shoe with 1985 tech. Worth it for design, not for tech. Let's talk about this 'Bred Toe' colorway. Unboxing it, the color blocking is "fire"—such a perfect mix of the classic Bred and Chicago. The "air jordan 1 retro" construction is solid, no glue stains on my pair. On foot, the ankle collar is snug, which I like for support. It's a stiffer ride than, say, a Dunk Low. Major pro is the versatility; huge con is the comfort (or lack thereof). If you want history on your feet, cop. For pure comfort, skip. Just got these in! The 'University Blue' "Air Jordan 1 Retro" – wow, that color is beautiful in natural light. Construction feels good, typical retro build. Putting them on? Yeah, you'll need to break them in a bit; they're stiff at first. The design is a 10/10 for me. Compared to other retros in the Jordan series, it’s the same reliable formula. Biggest pro is obviously the bold, wearable color. Potential issue? Lack of modern tech. Worth it for the style? 100%. Not for comfort-seekers, though.

  • Shown: Navy Velvet
  • Style: CT8012-011

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5