The pastel pink and grey combo is way nicer in person than in photos. Sliding them on, they're lightweight and the break-in is minimal for a low-top. Comparing it to a Retro High, it’s obviously less restrictive around the ankle. Pro: Amazing summer vibe and great quality. Con: Light suede can be a stain magnet, so be careful. I'd recommend these to anyone wanting a fresh, low-key AJ1. If you prefer high-tops for ankle support, skip it. Here's my take after a full day in these. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" breaks in nicely, becoming more comfortable over time. The leather softens up. However, that initial stiffness is real. On camera, the shoe's proportions are perfect – it's why it's so photogenic. Compared to a low-top version, you get more support. The advantage is its sheer iconic status and how it completes a fit. The disadvantage is breathability; it can get warm. Great for fall/winter, maybe too much for summer. Saw these Air Jordan 1 Retro Lows on shelf & had to grab 'em ($115). The silhouette is clean, a more laid-back vibe than the Highs. Materials are fine for the price point. Slip them on and wow, they're much easier to wear - no stiff high-top collar. Comfort is similar (firm), but the low-cut makes them feel less restrictive. A great summer option if you love the AJ1 style but want something less bulky. High-top purists might disagree, though! Who are these for? Honestly, for sneakerheads who appreciate the history, or someone wanting their first major iconic shoe. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is a cornerstone. Who should avoid them? People with serious foot issues needing arch support or maximum cushion – please, look at other options. For everyone else, it's a style investment that rarely fails.

  • Shown: Royal
  • Style: CT8527-100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5