Man, this is a popular one for a reason. The brown and black suede/leather combo is so rich and premium-looking. On foot, they feel substantial and well-made. However, like most AJ1s, the break-in is real – expect some heel stiffness initially. For $170, you're getting a modern classic that works with almost any fall/winter fit. It's a great alternative to the classic "Bred" color blocking. Probably not the best choice if you're looking for a breathable summer shoe, though. Here’s my honest take. If you're after modern cushioning, "look elsewhere". The "air jordan 1 retro" is about heritage, not hype (well, mostly). It's a fashion staple. I'd recommend it to any sneakerhead building a collection, or someone who just wants a classic shoe. Not for the performance seeker, at all. Who might want to skip it? If you need supreme cushioning—think all-day standing or lots of walking—look at New Balance or modern Jordans. The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is about style, not tech. Also, if you prefer a super-flexible, minimalist shoe, this structured, high-top feel might not be your thing. Comparing these to, say, a Jordan 3 or 4? The "Air Jordan 1 Retro" is noticeably lighter and less bulky. That's a huge plus for all-day wear. The downside? The toe box creases... like, really obviously. You gotta be cool with that lived-in look fast.
