Air jordan 11 cmft low : Comparing them side-by-side with my 2016 Jordan 11 Low 'Concords' is night and day [gwezdyjd]

The OG is stiffer, tighter, more structured. This Air Jordan 11 CMFT Low is its relaxed cousin. It’s lighter on-foot and the materials conform to you. It's a different purpose—both are cool, but for different reasons. On foot for a full day, and I'm impressed. Breathability is decent for a low-top, and the comfort holds up. The outsole is durable rubber, good for pavement. They're easy to style with shorts or jeans. For a summer sneaker that gives you a piece of Jordan history without the stiffness? This 'Vachetta Tan' "Air Jordan 11 CMFT Low" is a winner. On feet now – wow, the comfort difference is "immediate". The 'CMFT' tag isn't just for show. That full-length foam midsole? It's way plusher & softer than a standard Jordan retro low. The fit is true to size for me, with a nice, secure lockdown. It’s a Jordan you can genuinely walk in all day without that typical stiff break-in period. Big point in its favor. Here's the real talk: the pros? Incredible comfort for casual use, a recognizable—yet fresh—look, and it's typically easier to get than retros. Cons? The materials aren't premium, and it lacks that "special" feeling of a classic Jordan release. For $180, you're paying mostly for the look and the cushioning tech.

• Shown: Pine Green
• Style: 555088-105