Air jordan 11 cmft low : Let's compare it to the OG "Jordan 11 Low" [rcize4y1]

The classic is for purists—stiff, shiny, a statement. This "11 CMFT Low"? It's the comfortable cousin. You lose some of that structural "pop," but you gain a ton in wearability. It's a trade-off. If you want to hoop or want the exact 1996 look, get the retro. For walking, casual fits? This is a compelling alternative. Final verdict? For "me", it's a yes. I appreciate what they're doing: updating a classic for modern comfort. Do I wish it was a bit more structured? Maybe. But the overall package – the look, the feel, the price point – works. The Air Jordan 11 CMFT Low earns a spot in my rotation as a reliable, stylish, and "actually comfortable" shoe. Now, a potential con for purists: it "feels" different. If you're chasing that exact '95-era fit & firm ride, you might be disappointed. The softer materials don't have the same 'premium' heft. The outsole is less detailed. It's a reinterpretation, not a replica. For some, that's a dealbreaker. For me? It's a welcome evolution for actual "comfort". On feet right now. The fit is true-to-size, with a nice, snug—not tight—feel. The sole is softer than expected! Visually, the lowered collar changes the whole profile, but in a good, modern way. Pros? Breathability and comfort. Cons? It loses that iconic, stiff AJ11 "bootie" feel. Worth it at $175? For casual wear, 100%.

• Shown: Dark Mocha
• Style: CT8532-008