The Air Jordan 11 Low delivers exactly what it promises: iconic design in a low-top package. Materials feel premium, the colorways are often hits, and they hold up well. Is it a must-have? For 11 fans, yes – it's a staple. For newcomers to the Jordan series, it's a great entry point to a legendary model. Just know you're paying for heritage and style, not cutting-edge tech. Hope this honest review helps Comparing it to the high-top "Jordan 11"? You lose some ankle lockdown, obviously, but you gain a ton of everyday versatility. The low profile is way easier to style with shorts. The iconic design elements are all there—the patent leather mudguard, the Jumpman—just in a more laid-back package. It’s a great alternative if you find the highs a bit too much. Let's talk looks on foot. Man, the "Air Jordan 11 Low" silhouette is just timeless. The way the black patent leather contrasts with the white mesh upper is so clean. In natural light, that patent leather really shines. They make your legs look longer, and they go with "so" many fits – shorts, jeans, you name it. A definite style win from the Jordan series. Here are the "Air Jordan 11 Low "White Cement""—wait, is that elephant print on the collar? Yep! That's the headline. Opening the box, the mix of clean white & that iconic print is a clever twist. The "air jordan 11 low" silhouette keeps it sleek. Fit is perfect for my normal size. Compared to a standard "Jordan 3", this is a much lighter, more streamlined wear. Major "advantage": it's a fresh take that still feels familiar. A potential "drawback"? The lighter-colored mesh might get dirty fast. My verdict? If you love the Cement aesthetic but want a lower-profile, summer-ready shoe, this is a fantastic pick. If you're rough on your kicks, the maintenance might be a hassle.

  • Shown: Obsidian
  • Style: CT4954-007

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5