First off, the build quality? Seriously impressive — that patent leather cut is clean, and the white upper is pristine. Right out of the box, you get that classic, sleek AJ11 silhouette, just… lower. Compared to the high-top version, this low-cut offers a totally different vibe — more casual, less bulky for sure. At around $200 USD, it's a solid piece of Jordan Series history you can actually wear daily. Just got the "Air Jordan 11 Low IE "Bred"" in—a deep cut from the archive! The box is different, & the shoe itself has that unique mesh-&-leather construction. Honestly, the build feels great. Putting them on… whoa, they fit a bit roomier than the standard patent leather "11 low". They're also noticeably more flexible & breathable. The "big plus" here is uniqueness & heritage for true sneakerheads. The "downside"? The design isn't for everyone; some might find it less "iconic" than the original. At its retail price, this is a shoe for "Jordan" historians & fans of '90s performance design. If you only love the shiny patent leather look, this isn't your model. Alright, so I just unboxed this pair of "Air Jordan 11 Lows" in the "White and Varsity Red" colorway, retailing around $185. First off — man, that patent leather still pops! The build quality feels solid for a low-top. Initial thoughts? It’s a clean, classic Jordan series silhouette that immediately stands out, even in low form. That glossy mudguard is just "so" iconic. Comparing this 'Air Jordan 11 Low' to other Jordans? It's lighter & more breathable than the iconic high-top version, perfect for warmer weather. The 'Cool Grey' pair I have is a go-to. But, that exposed patent leather edge? It can crease—fair warning. If you're super worried about keeping kicks pristine, that's a potential con. For casual wear, though, it's a non-issue.

  • Shown: Cool Grey
  • Style: 555088-711

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5