First impression out of the box? "Man", that color-blocking is just… iconic. The red, the white, the black—it’s clean. Construction feels solid, and the shape is on point. On foot, they’re surprisingly comfortable for a low-top… true to size, good lockdown. For around $130, you're getting a classic silhouette that works with "literally" anything. If you want a piece of history for daily wear, this is it. Just know, cushioning is basic—not for long walks. Let's talk about the elephant in the room — it's a flat, basic court shoe from the 80s, modernized only in colorways. The "Air Jordan Low 1" won't cradle your foot. But that's also its charm! It's raw, simple, and connected to the ground. If you want that authentic, old-school basketball sneaker feel? This is it. Just maybe... don't plan on walking 20,000 steps in them. Alright guys, let's unbox these Air Jordan Low 1s in the classic "Black Toe" colorway. First impression? Solid. The leather feels decent for the $130 price tag & the iconic low-top silhouette is just so clean. It's that timeless Jordan series shape we all know. Holding it, you immediately get why this is a staple. Very promising start, let's get them on feet. Just copped this "Shadow" Air Jordan Low 1. First thing I noticed? The build is really consistent. That low-cut silhouette is so versatile. Price was about $135 USD. On feet, they feel great – true to size, with a nice locked-in feel around the midfoot. The low profile makes them super easy to pair with jeans or shorts. A major advantage is their comfort for walking. A slight downside? They can feel a bit flat if you're used to super-cushioned sneakers. Personally, I think these are a must-have for any casual rotation. I wouldn't recommend them for running or gym sessions, though – that's not their purpose.

  • Shown: Denim
  • Style: 555088-500

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5