The "Air Jordan Low 1" won't cradle your foot. But that's also its charm! It's raw, simple, and connected to the ground. If you want that authentic, old-school basketball sneaker feel? This is it. Just maybe... don't plan on walking 20,000 steps in them. Alright, let's get into these! First impression out of the box? Clean. Super clean. This 'White Cement Grey' colorway of the "Air Jordan Low 1" is just a timeless, versatile look. The leather feels decent, the shape is on point—it’s exactly what you expect from a classic Jordan model. For around $120 USD, you're paying for that iconic silhouette and everyday wearability, which I think is pretty fair. A solid start, honestly. Alright, let's get into it. Just unboxed this pair of "air jordan low 1"s in the Chicago colorway – honestly, the quality is solid for the $120 price tag. The leather feels decent, and that classic silhouette? It's "instant" head-turner. On foot, the fit is true to size with a snug, secure wrap. It's not the most padded shoe ever, but for a low-top, it gets the job done. If you're after a classic, versatile sneaker from the Jordan series, this is a no-brainer. Just don't expect plush, modern comfort. What's up, let's get into this Air Jordan Low 1 "University Blue" pair. Unboxing, the colors really pop – that clean white and blue combo is "chef's kiss". For a low-top, it carries the Jordan 1 legacy perfectly. On foot, they're light and easy to wear. The leather quality here is good for the $125 USD price point. Compared to a Mid, the profile is just a bit sleeker. Big pro is the easy summer styling. A potential con? The break-in period for the heel area can be real for some folks. I'd recommend these if you love clean colorways. Maybe look elsewhere if you need arch support right out the box.

  • Shown: Game Royal
  • Style: CT8527-115

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5