It's a statement piece within the classic Jordan 1 low framework. Priced at about $135 USD, it's in that sweet spot. Putting them on, the fit is snug – I'd say true to size. They feel substantial but not heavy. The design pops on camera, no doubt. Main pro: You get that iconic Jordan vibe in a low package. Main con: The ankle padding is minimal, which could bother some. My verdict? Perfect for adding a colorful classic to your wardrobe. Not the best if you need a lot of ankle support or padding. For anyone debating between mids and lows, here’s my take. The "Air Jordan Low 1" offers a different vibe — it’s less restrictive, more breathable for warmer days. The silhouette looks great from every angle on camera, too. The 'White Cement Grey' pair I got for $135 is super easy to style. Honestly, if you own a lot of high-tops, adding a low is a smart move for variety. Major pros? Timeless style, hands down. The Air Jordan Low 1 goes with almost anything—jeans, shorts, joggers. It's a wardrobe workhorse. Build quality on my "Shadow" pair is good; no glaring flaws. It's also more accessible & often easier to get than some high-top colorways. For a sneakerhead building a rotation, this is a fundamental piece you won't regret. Just copped this Air Jordan Low 1 in the 'Starfish' orange. WOW, the color is even better in person—super rich. Construction is standard Jordan 1 fare: good, not exceptional. On foot? They feel secure, but break them in indoors first. The real magic is on-foot; the low cut lets your pants do the talking. Compared to a Dunk Low, the toe box is a bit more refined. Pro: insane color that still feels wearable. Potential con: the bold color isn't for everyone's closet. At this price point, it's a fun splash. Recommend if you love color; maybe skip if your wardrobe is all neutrals.

  • Shown: Taupe Haze
  • Style: 378037-117

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5